Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 258
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 624-629

Assessment of Agreement between the National (Indian Academy of Pediatrics) and International (Centers for Disease Control and World Health Organization) growth references among tibetan adolescent girls of Kangra District, Himachal Pradesh


Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Shweta Singh
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110007
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_22_20

Rights and Permissions

Context: Various growth assessment references are available to assess nutritional status. The use of body mass index (BMI) in adolescents is well established for clinical and public health applications. It is required to compare national references with the international, to avoid over/underestimation of BMI categories. Aims: The aim of the present study was to quantify differences in the assessment of height/age and BMI/age ratios using national (Indian Academy of Pediatrics [IAP]) and international (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], and World Health Organization [WHO]) references. Subjects and Methods: Anthropometric measurements of 276 Tibetan adolescent girls (13–18 years old) were taken. BMI-for-age and height-for-age were measured and compared using three references – IAP 2015, WHO 2007, and CDC 2000. Statistical Analysis Used: Kappa coefficient was done between different references using SPSS version 20 and MS-excel. Results: The prevalence of overweight/obesity was reported highest (23.55%) by IAP references, while stunting was highest (17.26%) with CDC references. A substantial agreement (k = 0.623) was observed in stunting and almost perfect agreement (k = 0.868) was observed for BMI categories between WHO and CDC. The disagreement level was highest in IAP and CDC for stunting and IAP and WHO for BMI categories. Conclusions: Prevalence of malnutrition differs with the application of different references. National references producing higher estimates of obesity than international definition indicates that decisions regarding whether or not to use national BMI references, should always be undertaken with caution.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed240    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal