Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 486--497

Role of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of neck masses


Gaveshani Mantri1, Ashwin Ashok Jaiswal1, Rajeev Kumar Pal2, Neeta Sharma1 
1 Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, J.L.N. Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, J.L.N. Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Gaveshani Mantri
Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, J.L.N. Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai - 490 009, Chhattisgarh
India

Objective: The objective of the study is to study the efficacy of ultrasonography (USG) and fine- needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the evaluation of neck masses and differentiating between cystic, inflammatory, benign, and malignant neck masses with a histopathological correlation. Study Design: Prospective study and observational study. Setting: J. L. N. Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai (C. G). Study Period: June 1, 2016–May 30, 2017. Materials and Methods: Sonographically, neck masses were evaluated final diagnosis was made on the basis of FNAC and histopathology of excised specimens. Finally, the USG findings were correlated with FNAC report and histopathology reports (wherever possible) to evaluate their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy by statistical methods. Results: Most of the cases clustered between 31 and 60 years of age group. Among all patients, males outnumbered the females with the M:F ratio 1.5:1. Hyperechoic and anechoic lesions suggested benign pathology, whereas chances of malignancy were highest with hypoechoic lesions. As diagnosed by USG, the majority was benign lesion (36.4%), followed by inflammatory neck masses (27.08%), then cystic neck masses (20.83%) and least was malignant masses (15.63%). FNAC impression diagnosed benign mass (32.29%), inflammatory mass (26.04%), cystic mass (19.79%), and malignant mass (15.63%). The diagnostic accuracy of USG, FNAC, and Histopathological Examination (HPE) was comparable as P ≤ 0.05 for inflammatory, cystic, benign, and malignant neck masses. Conclusion: High-resolution grayscale ultrasound can differentiate inflammatory, cystic, benign and malignant neck masses. FNAC can be considered highly efficacious in distinguishing benign and malignant neck masses. A team work between a cytopathologist, radiologist, and clinician maximizes the diagnostic utility of USG and FNAC.


How to cite this article:
Mantri G, Jaiswal AA, Pal RK, Sharma N. Role of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of neck masses.Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2020;13:486-497


How to cite this URL:
Mantri G, Jaiswal AA, Pal RK, Sharma N. Role of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of neck masses. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 27 ];13:486-497
Available from: https://www.mjdrdypv.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8302;year=2020;volume=13;issue=5;spage=486;epage=497;aulast=Mantri;type=0